THE EFFECT OF PREVENTION FOR PEER BULLYING IN SECONDARY SCHOOL
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 64-68
October 2018

THE EFFECT OF PREVENTION FOR PEER BULLYING IN SECONDARY SCHOOL

Turk Med Stud J 2018;5(3):64-68
1. Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, TURKEY
2. Department of Children and Adolescent Mental Health and Diseases, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, TURKEY
3. Department of Public Health, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, TURKEY
4. Department of Medical Biochemistry, Manisa Celal Bayar University School of Medicine, Manisa, TURKEY
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 08.09.2018
Accepted Date: 17.09.2018
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Aims:

Peer bullying is a frequent problem among adolescents. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of complementary prevention for peer bullying in 11-14-year-old adolescents with family, teacher, student collaboration and to assess the effect of peer bullying on the quality of life.

Methods:

Seven hundred sixty students registered in school between ages 11-14, and who accepted to participate in the study were included in our investigation. Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory were used as data collection tools in the study. After the pre-test, school teachers and two selected students from each class; a total of 48 students were trained in peer bullying in small group. Interactive awareness activities were organized for the students at the school with all trained students and teachers to raise awareness of peer bullying. Afterwards, information brochures were distributed to the children and parents. 3 weeks after the training post-test was applied. The statistical evaluation of the study was carried out by using Chi-square and Student’s t-tests.

Results:

The questions about bullying and victimization were analyzed. In the study, the rate of victim students reduced from 43.2% to 30.4%; the rate of bully students reduced from 23.4% to 21.7%. There was a significant reduction in the rate of people involved in peer bullying. Nevertheless, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory assessment of health-related quality of life in our group showed that the quality of life of students who were not involved in peer bullying was significantly higher. After our training, quality of life significantly increased in students who were not involved in bullying, compared to the ones who are involved in bullying.

Conclusion:

In our study group, it was observed that the quality of life of students who were not involved in peer bullying was significantly higher. The number of people involved in peer bullying decreased significantly. The low number of invalid surveys revealed that our research was successful in attracting the attention of the target group.