BACTERIAL THERAPIES IN CANCER TREATMENT: ADVANCES, MECHANISMS, AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
REVIEW
VOLUME: 12 ISSUE: 1
P: 11 - 16
February 2025

BACTERIAL THERAPIES IN CANCER TREATMENT: ADVANCES, MECHANISMS, AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

Turk Med Stud J 2025;12(1):11-16
1. Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara, TÜRKİYE
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 24.12.2024
Accepted Date: 17.02.2025
Online Date: 26.02.2025
Publish Date: 26.02.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death, and despite remarkable advances in treatment, chemotherapy remains the primary therapeutic approach. However, the emergence of drug resistance presents a major challenge, often limiting the efficacy of conventional treatments. As a result, developing novel therapeutic strategies has gained increasing importance in recent years. One such emerging approach is the use of bacteria in cancer therapy. Bacterial therapies offer unique mechanisms to target cancer cells and stimulate the immune response, providing a promising alternative to traditional treatments. This review aims to explore the potential of bacterial-based therapies in overcoming drug resistance and improving cancer treatment outcomes.

Keywords:
Bacteria, cancer, immunostimulation, treatment

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, after cardiovascular diseases (1). In 2020, an estimated 19.3 million cancer patients were newly diagnosed, and ten million deaths due to cancer occurred worldwide (2). The most frequent diagnoses included lung, prostate, colorectal, and breast cancers (3). Lung cancer, for instance, is the most prevalent form of cancer among men (1). These statistics underscore the urgent need to develop novel therapeutic approaches, and one such promising strategy is the use of bacterial therapies in cancer treatments (4). These strategies can be categorized into the following four sub-methods (5):

1. Bacterial vectors utilized for the targeted delivery of genetically engineered therapeutic agents.

2. Bacterial toxins for the inhibition of tumor growth.

3. Bacteria-mediated immunostimulation in cancer treatment.

4. Combination therapies integrating bacterial treatments with immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Bacterial Vectors Utilized for the Targeted Delivery of Genetically Engineered Therapeutic Agents

Bacterial vectors have emerged as promising tools for the targeted delivery of genetically engineered therapeutic agents in cancer therapy. These vectors leverage the natural properties of bacteria to selectively home in on tumor sites, offering unique methods for localized treatment and minimizing damage to healthy tissues (6). A landmark study by Minton et al. (7) demonstrated that bacterial spores could inhibit cell growth, highlighting their potential in anticancer therapies. This early research laid the foundation for subsequent explorations into the use of bacterial vectors in cancer treatment.

Further advancements were made in a 1997 study by Pawelek et al. (8), in which the anticancer effects of a genetically modified Salmonella strain were observed. This study revealed that Salmonella could selectively colonize the tumor microenvironment (8). Once in the tumor, the bacteria activated the immune system and produced therapeutic genes and toxins that specifically targeted tumor cells, offering a novel approach to cancer treatment (8).

Subsequent studies have demonstrated that bacteria selectively colonize tumor tissues, proliferate in hypoxic environments, and induce cancer cell destruction by producing enzymes and toxins (9). Genetic engineering techniques have enabled a more precise control of the bacteria’s tumor-targeting abilities as well as the incorporation of novel functions to enhance their therapeutic potential (10).

Several different studies have been conducted in bacterial vector-based cancer immunotheraphy (Table 1).

Bacterial Toxins for the Inhibition of Tumor Growth

Bacterial toxins exhibit high cytotoxic effects and specific targeting capabilities, which make them promising agents in cancer treatment that selectively target specific surface receptors on cancer cells or exploit the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (17). Treatment strategies employing these toxins include immunotoxins, targeted therapies, and gene therapy (18). Immunotoxins, which are generated through the conjugation of bacterial toxins with monoclonal antibodies, enable more precise targeting of cancer cells (19). In contrast, targeted therapies aim to modify tumor cells to enhance their binding to specific surface antigens, thereby reducing the likelihood of damaging normal cells (20). Additionally, incorporating bacterial toxin genes into gene therapy strategies facilitates the targeted production of toxins within tumor cells, a mechanism that can be categorized into three key subheadings (21).

a. Direct Cytotoxicity

Certain bacterial toxins, such as diphtheria toxin and Pseudomonas exotoxin, can infiltrate cancer cells and disrupt essential cellular processes, particularly protein synthesis (22). This disruption ultimately leads to cell death. These toxins can be engineered to specifically target overexpressed receptors in cancer cells, thereby minimizing damage to healthy tissues.

b. Immune Modulation

Toxins such as superantigens are known for their ability to activate the immune system by triggering a significant release of cytokines (23). This cascade recruits immune cells, particularly T cells, to the tumor microenvironment, enhancing the immune-mediated destruction of tumor cells and inhibiting further tumor growth (24).

c. Apoptosis Induction

Certain bacterial toxins can induce programmed cell death (apoptosis) in tumor cells (25). For instance, toxins produced by Clostridium perfringens can disrupt cellular membranes, promoting apoptosis, particularly in the hypoxic conditions often present in tumor cores (Table 2) (26).

Bacteria-Mediated Immunostimulation in Cancer Treatment

The entry of bacteria into the host initiates a rapid and robust immune system stimulation that leads to an immediate immune response critical for combating malignancies (Figure 1) (31). This response predominantly activates innate immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and natural killer (NK) cells, which collectively enhance the body’s defenses against cancer cells. Key molecular components found in bacterial cell walls, such as lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and peptidoglycans, function as pathogen-associated molecular patterns recognized by pattern recognition receptors on immune cells (32). This recognition triggers a cascade of signaling events that culminate in significant immune activation.

The immunostimulatory effects of bacteria are mediated through several mechanisms. First, bacteria can be directly introduced into the tumor microenvironment, where they induce local inflammation and attract immune effector cells to the tumor site (33). Second, certain bacteria can produce toxins capable of selectively inducing apoptosis in cancer cells, thereby reducing tumor burden and further stimulating the immune response (34). Third, bacteria can induce long-lasting immunological memory, enhancing the host’s ability to mount a rapid response against recurrent tumors (35). Finally, innovative therapeutic strategies involving engineered bacteria exploit these mechanisms to enhance the efficacy of existing cancer treatments, including checkpoint inhibitors and other immunotherapeutic approaches (36).

In summary, bacteria-mediated strategies highlight the potential of leveraging microbial interactions to enhance immune function in cancer therapy. By targeting tumor cells directly and modulating the immune system, these approaches may establish a durable antitumor response, representing a promising avenue in the fight against cancer.

Combination Therapies Integrating Bacterial Treatments with Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy

Bacterial therapies are gaining attention in cancer treatment due to their ability to both directly target tumors and stimulate the immune system. These therapies, when combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy, offer a synergistic approach, potentially enhancing therapeutic outcomes and addressing drug resistance (37).

Bacteria can activate the immune system through molecules like LPS and peptidoglycans that are present in their cell walls. These components are recognized by immune cells such as macrophages, dendritic cells, and NK cells, leading to a strong immune response (38). When used alongside checkpoint inhibitors, like Programmed cell death protein 1/Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockers, bacterial therapies can further boost the immune system’s ability to attack cancer cells, which helps to overcome immune evasion mechanisms (39).

Additionally, bacterial therapies complement chemotherapy by localizing within the tumor microenvironment, allowing for more targeted drug delivery. This improves drug efficacy while minimizing side effects on healthy tissue. Bacteria also help disrupt the tumor’s physical barriers, enhancing drug penetration and overall treatment effectiveness (40).

Genetically engineered bacteria add further precision to this approach. Modified bacteria can deliver chemotherapeutic agents directly to tumors, ensuring higher concentrations at the target site while reducing systemic toxicity (41). This targeted delivery is particularly beneficial for combating resistant tumors and improving the safety profile of chemotherapy (42). A comprehensive treatment strategy is achieved by combining bacterial therapies with immunotherapy and chemotherapy (Figure 2). While immunotherapy amplifies the immune response against cancer, chemotherapy directly attacks proliferating tumor cells, and bacteria enhance these effects by improving immune activation and drug targeting. This multi-pronged approach can reduce the likelihood of resistance, a major challenge in cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

Bacterial treatment methods are emerging as promising alternatives in cancer therapy. Through various strategies such as tumor targeting, immunotherapy, gene therapy, and oncolytic bacteria, bacterial vectors can be effective in eliminating cancer cells. In particular, bacterial treatment methods offer significant advantages alongside traditional therapies by enhancing the immune system, modulating the tumor microenvironment, and providing targeted therapeutic approaches.

However, several challenges and limitations exist in the clinical applications of bacterial treatment methods. Issues such as the control of bacterial infections, minimizing side effects during treatment, and determining appropriate dosages should be the focal points of research. Furthermore, it is essential to integrate bacterial treatment methods with immunotherapies to enhance their effectiveness.

Future research should focus more on both preclinical and clinical studies to improve the efficacy and safety of bacterial treatment methods and deepen the knowledge in this field. In conclusion, bacterial treatment strategies open a new horizon in cancer therapy and play a significant role in the fight against cancer through a multidisciplinary approach.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: N/A.
Informed Consent: N/A.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflict of interest.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
World Health Organization. (2020). Cancer. Avaliable from:
2
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.
3
American Cancer Society. (2021). Cancer Facts & Figures 2021. Available from:
4
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646-74.
5
Luo M, Chen X, Gao H et al. Bacteria-mediated cancer therapy: a versatile bio-sapper with translational potential. Front Oncol. 2022;12:980111.
6
Duong MTQ, Qin Y, You SH et al. Bacteria-cancer interactions: bacteria-based cancer therapy. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51(1):1-15.
7
Minton NP, Mauchline ML, Lemmon MJ et al. Chemotherapeutic tumour targeting using clostridial spores. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1995;17(3):357-64.
8
Pawelek JM, Low KB, Bermudes D. Bacteria as tumour-targeting vectors. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(9):548-56.
9
St. Jean AT, Zhang M, Forbes NS. Bacterial therapies: completing the cancer treatment toolbox. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19(5):511-7.
10
Chen Y, Liu X, Guo Y et al. Genetically engineered oncolytic bacteria as drug delivery systems for targeted cancer theranostics. Acta Biomater. 2021;124:72-87.
11
Pei P, Zhang Y, Jiang Y et al. Pleiotropic immunomodulatory functions of radioactive inactivated bacterial vectors for enhanced cancer radio-immunotherapy. ACS Nano. 2022;16(7):11325-37.
12
Le Gouëllec A, Chauchet X, Laurin D et al. A safe bacterial microsyringe forin vivo antigen delivery and immunotherapy. Mol Ther. 2013;21(5):1076-86.
13
Stark FC, Sad S, Krishnan L. Intracellular bacterial vectors that induce CD8 (+) T cells with similar cytolytic abilities but disparate memory phenotypes provide contrasting tumor protection. Cancer Res. 2009;69(10):4327-34.
14
Wang Y, Le Gouëllec A, Chaker H et al. Optimization of antitumor immunotherapy mediated by type III secretion system-based live attenuated bacterial vectors. J Immunother. 2012;35(3):223-34.
15
Avogadri F, Martinoli C, Petrovska L et al. Cancer immunotherapy based on killing ofSalmonella-infected tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(9):3920-7.
16
Wood LM, Guirnalda PD, Seavey MM et al. Cancer immunotherapy usingListeria monocytogenes and listerial virulence factors. Immunol Res. 2008;42(1-3):233-45.
17
Zahaf NI, Schmidt G. Bacterial toxins for cancer therapy. Toxins (Basel). 2017;9(8):236.
18
Pahle J, Walther W. Bacterial toxins for oncoleaking suicidal cancer gene therapy. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2016;209:95-110.
19
Akbari B, Farajnia S, Ahdi Khosroshahi S et al. Immunotoxins in cancer therapy: review and update. Int Rev Immunol. 2017;36(4):207-19.
20
Pastan I, Hassan R, Fitzgerald DJ et al. Immunotoxin therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6(7):559-65.
21
Keyvani K, Baur I, Paulus W. Tetracycline-controlled expression but not toxicity of an attenuated diphtheria toxin mutant. Life Sci. 1999;64(19):1719-24.
22
Dieffenbach M, Pastan I. Mechanisms of resistance to immunotoxins containing Pseudomonas Exotoxin A in cancer therapy. Biomolecules. 2020;10(7):979.
23
Antunez MI, Cardoni RL. Superantígenos: una particular interacción entre microorganismos y el sistema inmune [Superantigens: a particular interaction between microorganisms and the immune system]. Medicina (B Aires). 1997;57(5):608-16.
24
Vallera DA, Jin N, Shu Y et al. Retroviral immunotoxin gene therapy of leukemia in mice using leukemia-specific T cells transduced with an interleukin-3/Bax fusion protein gene. Hum Gene Ther. 2003;14(18):1787-98.
25
Zhang X, Hu X, Rao X. Apoptosis induced byStaphylococcus aureus toxins. Microbiol Res. 2017;205:19-24.
26
Navarro MA, McClane BA, Uzal FA. Mechanisms of action and cell death associated withClostridium perfringens toxins. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(5):212.
27
Buzzi S, Rubboli D, Buzzi G et al. CRM197 (non-toxic diphtheria toxin): effects on advanced cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004;53(11):1041-8.
28
Weber F, Asher A, Bucholz R et al. Safety, tolerability, and tumor response of IL4-Pseudomonas exotoxin (NBI-3001) in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Neurooncol. 2003;64(1-2):125-37.
29
Janku F, Zhang HH, Pezeshki A et al. Intratumoral injection ofClostridium novyi-NT spores in patients with treatment-refractory advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(1):96-106.
30
Hassan R, Miller AC, Sharon E et al. Major cancer regressions in mesothelioma after treatment with an anti-mesothelin immunotoxin and immune suppression. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(208):208ra147.
31
Roe JM, Seely K, Bussard CJ et al. Hacking the immune response to solid tumors: harnessing the anti-cancer capacities of oncolytic bacteria. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(7):2004.
32
Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001;1(2):135-45.
33
Iida N, Dzutsev A, Stewart CA et al. Commensal bacteria control cancer response to therapy by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Science. 2013;342(6161):967-70.
34
Keppler-Hafkemeyer A, Brinkmann U, Pastan I. Role of caspases in immunotoxin-induced apoptosis of cancer cells. Biochemistry. 1998;37(48):16934-42.
35
Goto Y, Iwata S, Miyahara M et al. Discovery of intratumoral oncolytic bacteria toward targeted anticancer theranostics. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(20):e2301679.
36
Huang X, Pan J, Xu F et al. Bacteria-based cancer immunotherapy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(7):2003572.
37
Deb D, Wu Y, Coker C et al. Design of combination therapy for engineered bacterial therapeutics in non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):21551.
38
Мokrozub VV, Lazarenko LM, Sichel LM et al. The role of beneficial bacteria wall elasticity in regulating innate immune response. EPMA J. 2015;6(1):13.
39
Li F, Yang Z, Savage TM et al. Programmable bacteria synergize with PD-1 blockade to overcome cancer cell-intrinsic immune resistance mechanisms. Sci Immunol. 2024;9(100):eadn9879.
40
Shuwen H, Yifei S, Xinyue W et al. Advances in bacteria-based drug delivery systems for anti-tumor therapy. Clin Transl Immunology. 2024;13(7):e1518.
41
Harimoto T, Danino T. Engineering bacteria for cancer therapy. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019;3(5):623-9.
42
Zhao X, Xie N, Zhang H et al. Bacterial drug delivery systems for cancer therapy: “why” and “how”. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(9):2214.